Edwards, K. E. & Jones, S. R. (2009). "'Putting my man face on': A grounded theory of college men's gender identity development". Journal of College Student Development, 50, 210-228.
Grounded theory in articles - Methodology (2009)
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2009). "Two cases of ethnography: Grounded theory and the extended case method". Ethnography, 10 (3), 243-263.
Sixth Annual Grounded Theory Jamboree
Sixth Annual Grounded Theory Jamboree: “Uncorking (classical) Grounded Theory”
Resolving the Confusion and Uncertainty learning and doing classical Grounded Theory
To resolve your confusion around doing classical Grounded Theory. Participants will be able to direct their energy into doing their classical Grounded Theory research, and generate relevant and meaningful Grounded Theories.
Venue: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date: August 3rd-5th, 2011
a dissertation using GT approach
Bloemhard, A. C. (2006). The care that shines from within': The role of spirituality in aged and palliative care. MA. South Cross University.
(read Chapter3.5, using GT as an approach)
(read Chapter3.5, using GT as an approach)
Grounded theory in reports - Computer Science (2010)
Muller, M. J. & Kogan, S. (2010). "Grounded Theory Method in HCI and CSCW". IBM Watson Research in Cambridge. Report: 10-09.
open-minded, literature review and GT
Christina Pikas wrote "Random observation: true grounded theory vs. foreshadowed problems" on her blog to talk about the "pre-knowledge" issue.
Actually, I had a similar question before. Should a researcher be Tabula rasa? Applying Grounded Theory approach is not to say we go into the field what we research about without pre-knowledge or views. It's about, as a researcher, we need to recognise this issue and interpret data by exploring its meaning in that researched context. We can wrote down what we had known and what views we have, we also can compare some existent literatures or opinions, but it shouldn't affect the data analysis.
As May (1986: 149) noted:
Actually, I had a similar question before. Should a researcher be Tabula rasa? Applying Grounded Theory approach is not to say we go into the field what we research about without pre-knowledge or views. It's about, as a researcher, we need to recognise this issue and interpret data by exploring its meaning in that researched context. We can wrote down what we had known and what views we have, we also can compare some existent literatures or opinions, but it shouldn't affect the data analysis.
As May (1986: 149) noted:
The literature review in a grounded theory project neither provides key concepts nor suggests hypotheses as it does in hypothetico-deductive research. A lengthy or uncritical literature review in a grounded theory study can, in fact, reflect overdependence on existing knowledge. However, a review of existing literature can show gaps or systematic bias in existing knowledge, thus provide the rationale for launching a grounded theory study.May, K.A. (1986). "Writing and evaluating the grounded theory research report". In: Chenitz, W.C. & Swanson, J.M. (eds.), From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing, pp. 146-154. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)